Entries Tagged as 'That's Personal'

NaNoWriMo Launch

Today is the first day of National Novel Writing Month: NaNoWriMo for short. This is my second year of signing up for this event which boasts 125,000 participant writers from around the world. In my little corner of the world, I’ve located 6 other WriMos, and we are meeting at local Starbucks this afternoon for a Write-In as well as weekly for the rest of the month.

The purpose of the event is to complete 50,000 words of a “shitty first draft.” This quote is directly from Anne Lamott’s book Bird by Bird and is particularly fitting to the contest’s intention.  Chris Baty, who initiated the event in 1999 with 26 friends, is the first to say that the intention is not to write beautiful, lyrical, quotable prose. The goal is simply to give one’s imagination full rein until there are 50,000 words on the page.

I have to admit last year’s NaNoWriMo was a thrilling exercise in freedom for me. I wrote the worst mystery novel ever, but I discovered so many facets of my imagination in the process and so much about my ability to do concentrated work in a myriad of settings and under all kinds of conditions. WOW!

nano_07_winner_large.gif

Of course, I signed up again. I leaped from bed this morning, not early but nevertheless excited to start work on my new book. I filled my new NaNoWriMo mug with coffee (unused until this day), donned my blue chiffon porpoise-print writing jacket, opened a word doc, and typed the title of my book: The Right Sisters.

I’m off and running with 700 words! I’ll meet with my fellow WriMos this afternoon at Starbucks where we will down caffeine and write for 2 or more hours.

Are any of you, dear readers, participating? Please speak up! In the mean time, I’ll post periodic NaNoWriMo updates along with more thoughts on point of view over the next few weeks.

Kate Evans on Process

Author Kate Evans writes in not one but several genres: fiction, poetry (Like All We Love), non-fiction (Negotiating the Self), and blogging. In each case, she demonstrates clear competence managing the distinctive features particular to the genre. Kate is one smart lady.

For the May QueenIn the following interview, she responds to questions I asked about her process when writing her newly published novel For the May Queen. I was interested in how Kate’s “editeyes” worked as she approached the task of writing fiction.

ME: The setting of For the May Queen is dorm-life culture in the early 1980s, focusing on drinking, drugs, and sex prevalent in such a context. As a 60-year-old woman who came of age in the late 1960s, I admit to feeling a sense of disturbing recognition as well as powerless disappointment as I read, particularly during the first 2/3rds of the story. You manage to present this as a valid context for a rite of passage without minimizing it as a societal problem. Can you speak to how you arrived at telling a story that takes place in this particular context?

KATE: I lived in the dorms in the early 1980s.  I was always interested in writing about that experience.  I even tried to write about it as memoir, but that didn’t work for me. I worked on a lot of other things for years–poems, stories–when one day Norma’s voice came to me.  Then the dorms emerged as the setting.  It wasn’t really a conscious choice, but clearly that setting had been brewing in my mind for quite some time. 

The dorms are a good setting, I think, because there are many juicy built-in conflicts.  I chose the early 1980s because I didn’t want to deal with the internet and cell phones!  Well, that’s part of it.  The other part is, retro and nostalgia are fun.

ME: It is often said that a fiction writer’s first novel is to a great extent autobiographical. I’m interested in how this was so for you, particularly in terms of the characters in the story. Assuming there were prototypes in your experience for these characters, how and when did they become their own entities, more fictional and less the individuals from whom they originated?

KATE: I like that the semi-autobiographical novel is and is not the writer.  I think this genre or sub-genre allows us to play around with the slipperiness of the self.  I’m both Norma and not-Norma.  Norma’s both Kate and not-Kate.  It’s fun to play around like that.  As Jeanette Winterson says, reading yourself as fiction is liberating.

Of course memoirists do this too, to an extent–it’s just that the readers are more likely to see memoir as you, whereas readers have to grapple with fiction as being both you and not you.  I think it’s fun and exciting because I like identity to be in motion.

The characters became more fictional and then paradoxically more real–more truly themselves–the more I wrote them.  They became three-dimensional as they grappled with all the roadblocks I placed in their way, as they made choices and interacted and, ideally, grew.

ME: I particularly enjoyed the symbolism in the character’s names and how their names fleshed out the central theme about identity. For instance, Norma sits at the center of the story, thereby establishing the “norm” which is not exactly normal, and who is also called Norma Jean by Chuck thereby alluding to the subtext of the Marilyn Monroe persona. Chuck, who is really Paul, is renamed by Norma, consistent with his dual identity and her failure to see the real him.  Can you talk about the naming of characters and the degree to which your choices were consciously symbolic?

This is cool! Thanks for the great insights.  I didn’t make conscious choices about the names, but clearly my unconcious was busy at work.  It takes a reader like you to enter the story and help me see the method to the madness of my unconcious. 

When Norma walked into Paul’s dorm room, I didn’t know they were going to play around with each other’s names.  Paul’s calling Norma “Norma Jean” is led to his becoming a film buff–which evolved into being an essential aspect of his character.  Norma’s renaming Paul is certainly a way for her to claim him and to not-see him, but I didn’t have this in mind as I wrote it.  The playful banter was just part of their rapport.

ME: There are other symbols in the story: bridges, mirrors, and games, along with cultural icons like James Bond and Marilyn Monroe. The story explores themes like nonconformity, altered states, friendship, marriage, and even education and the relative value of an instructor’s choices for her students. How much of this arose organically in the story? Did you ever discover something inherent in the tale that you developed in the revision process?

KATE: All of it arose organically.  When a friend of mine read the manuscript, she noticed a bunch of references to fairy tales, like “Billy Goats Gruff ” and “Goldilocks.”  I didn’t know that was all in there.  That’s what’s so wonderful about writing.  It takes the readers to enrich, to complete, the experience.

I do think I amped up some of these patterns and recurrences in my revision, but not with an eye to theme.  It was more with an eye to repetition as a satisfying way to weave patterns into, or out of, chaos.

ME: Finally, you’ve mentioned that your editor sent you back to the drawing board to write a denouement—the second to the last chapter. Would you talk about your process in writing this chapter?

This was actually my agent who did this.  At any rate, he said he wanted to know the fall-out of Norma’s discoveries that are essentially the novel’s climax.  I realized he was right, that we never know what Norma does to grapple with what she suddenly sees.  Sorry for being so vague, but I don’t want to give away what Norma discovers for those who haven’t read the novel.  

At any rate, Norma discovers something big.  But my agent was right, the book couldn’t just end there.  We had to know how she grappled with what she discovered.  After I resisted for a while, it turned out to be really fun to watch her deal with this alone.  She turns to a book, in fact, for advice.  It’s the longest section in the novel that she’s alone, reading and thinking.  She gets more quiet and still than at any other part of the novel.  I saw her growing up just a little bit, right there.  It was very cool, and it provided a bridge to the last chapter.

Thanks Kate. I wonder if my readers have questions for you.

Showing up

 Eighty percent of success is showing up.
–Woody Allen

I often feel like I don’t have the time I want or need to focus on my writing. That’s why it works for me to stay connected with other writers who never cease to provide pointed reminders about how I can put writing first in my life.

This week’s reminder came from Rebecca Lawton in the October issue of her newsletter Write Free. I met Lawton four years ago at a weekend writing retreat up in Philo.

Rebecca LawtonLawton suggests making a pact with yourself to show up at your desk at least three days a week, ten minutes a day. Trick yourself into starting in on your creative project du jour by saying, “It’s just ten minutes. When I’m done, I can head off to other tasks.”

I immediately took on this assignment and had marvelous results. I’d been putting off a freelance project for days, telling myself I didn’t have a enough time to give to it fully. But Saturday, I told myself to give it just 10 minutes. Amazingly that was enough. I worked longer than 10 minutes because once I got started I didn’t want to stop AND when I had to stop to deal with some necessary chores, I continued to think about the project and returned to finish it later in the day because I had indirectly been engaged with it all day.

Lawton also connected the idea of showing up to the November election. Though I hesitate to regard myself as political, I long ago came to understand what the second wave feminists promoted, that is “the personal is political.” As Carol Hanisch said in an essay dated March 1969: “One of the first things we learn in the [encounter] groups is that personal problems are political problems.” So allow me, like Lawton, to move the idea of showing up in a political direction. fighton-cover-72.jpeg

Lawton wrote: “Showing up also counts when it comes to our democratic process–something much in the minds of American voters today.” One of my favorite bloggers, Tuckova, posted this great video about showing up: Five Friends

Give yourself 5 minutes to watch the video and then spend 10 minutes on a writing project.That’s a total of 15 minutes. Surely you have that to spare.

I’d be delighted if you’d write a few sentences in the comment section about how you spent 10 minutes writing.

Publishing Journey


Electing to self-publish my book Between Two Women was not an easy decision. I wanted my book to be selected by a publisher for I believed that would be the ultimate acknowledgement that the work was worthy—both in terms of content and skillful writing.

I spent three years sending my manuscript to agents and publishers. I followed guidelines in books like

Into Print by Poets & Writers,

How To Get Happily Published by Judith Applebaum,

Putting Your Passion into Print by Arielle Eckstut & David Henry Sterry.

I carefully crafted query letters and developed a one-minute elevator pitch which I gave to multiple agents at the East of Eden Writers’ Conference. I sent my queries out and participated in the Maui Manuscript Marketplace.  I created a book proposal and sent it upon request to agents. Here is a sample of the responses I got:

You are a talented writer  [but] memoir has become a difficult genre to place.

We’ve just done a rash of lesbian memoirs so have to work on other things.

We found your memoir to be quiet well done . . . but feel it would be a very tough sell to commercial publishers.

I consistently got the message that since my book’s appeal was to a niche market, I should query small presses directly, particularly those who published books in my so-called niche. That’s when I learned that narrative non-fiction does not bode well as a calling card because fiction sells and therefore keeps small presses afloat. I got rejection letters from Alyson Press, Spinsters Ink, Cleis Press, and Firebrand. As Nickie Hastie says: “How can we buy the books they decide not to publish?”

After considerable rejection, I was thrilled when I friend helped me through the door of University of Wisconsin Press, introducing me and my manuscript to editor, Raphael Kadushin of the Living Out Series: Gay & Lesbian Autobiography. I got an email request from Kadushin to send the manuscript which I submitted immediately and then waited hopefully with only a tiny niggle of doubt.

I had studied the list of books published in the series. They had only published two books each in the previous two years and all four were about or by famous gay men, and the year my friend’s book was published, it was one of six books published and was the only lesbian book. Read what you will into these facts but note that after waiting for six weeks, I received a form letter (that was not signed) saying, “We have decided that your work does not coincide with our current publishing plans.”

A couple of months later I read an article in Writers’ Digest, Dec. 07 about gay and lesbian writing. Kadushin was interviewed and had this to say: “Coming out stories are no longer published unless they are wildly new or have a universal angle.”  He followed this remark with: “Writers [LGBT] have little aptitude to be truly dangerous or daring.”

That’s when I had a change of attitude. I knew my book contained essential stories about women in general and lesbians in particular, and therefore needed to find its way into print as a concrete historical record. It appeared that the only way to accomplish this was to self-publish.

The self-publishing journey is yet another interesting story.  More on that later.


Blog Tour

transparent_roseA common practice among bloggers is identifying and annotating the blogs they have been reading that might also be of interest to their readers. Sometimes this is done on a regular basis, say every Saturday, and sometimes it is the feature of particular topic the blog writer is addressing. I love this practice, not only because it extends the conversation but also because it leads me places I might not otherwise have gone. I haven’t yet decided how I will integrate “a carnival” of blogs into Editeyes, for I’d like it to emerge organically as the blog and I grow together.

Today, however, I am pointing directly to Misplaced Misfit, which appears on my blog roll. Keiti, who is Ms Misfit, is a cyber friend who has graciously, and I might add insightfully, interviewed me in the context of a blog tour — a kind of virtual book tour. Keiti, who lives in Florida, has timed the posting of her interview to coincide with the west coast launch of my book which will take place August 23 in Sonora, California.

To learn more about Between Two Women, please visit Keiti’s blog during the next few days.


View My Stats